| Summary of Reviewers' Comments             THIS STUDY OF ONE SPECIES IN A GROUP OF HYMENOPTERA THAT
  DEMONSTRATES GREAT DIVERSITY IN BEHAVIOUR HAS MERIT, BUT SORELY OMITS
  CRITICAL DETAILS IN "Materials & Methods" OF CULTURE AQUISITION
  AND EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR AN IN DEPTH CRITIQUE OF
  PREVIOUS PUBLISHED STUDIES.  AS  EXPERIMENTAL ENVIRONMENT AND HOST SIZE
  ESPECIALLY INFLUENCE SUPERPARASITIZATION PRECISE DETAILS ARE ESSENTIAL.  THERE IS AN ANALYSIS OF ONE AUTHOR'S WORK
  BUT AN OMISSION OF SEVERAL OTHERS THAT PRESENT CONFLICTING RESULTS.   RATHER, THE  POSSIBLE NEW DISCOVERY OF TWO REPRODUCTIVE  STRATEGIES FOR THIS SPECIES HAS NOT BEEN
  CONSIDERED. | 
 
|   GENETICS OF SOLITARY AND
  GREGARIOUS EMERGENCE IN THE PARASITOID WASP MUSCIDIFURAX RAPTORELLUS: PATERNAL MODIFICATION OF LARVAL AGGRESSION.   Richard Stouthamer1, and E. Fred Legner2   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1Department of Entomology, Wageningen Agricultural University P.O. Box 8031, 6700EH Wageningen, The Netherlands   2 Department of Entomology,
  University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA (e.legner@ucr.edu)   Summary          Studies with
  new field isolates of a Peruvian strain in 1995 by Richard Stouthamer et al.
  (unpublished) have shown a greater involvement of larval cannibalism and much
  complexity in these species' reproduction. 
  Indeed survival mechanisms in parasitoids include many behaviors;
  among which increased cannibalism by more aggressive larvae may be triggered
  during times of host scarcity.  The pteromalid parasitoid Muscidifurax raptorellus Kogan & Legner
  is polymorphic for its oviposition behavior, fly pupae parasitized by the
  solitary form always give rise to one offspring, while fly pupae parasitized
  by the gregarious form give rise to more than one offspring in approximately
  60% of the hosts. Legner has studied the inheritance of gregarious emergence,
  i.e. more than one wasp emerges per host, in great detail.  He found this trait to be polygenically
  controlled by 2‑19 genes. 
  Females carrying a higher percentage of their genome from the
  gregarious form have a higher percentage of their offspring emerging
  gregariously from a host.  More
  surprisingly he also found that the father's genetic background influenced
  the rate at which his progeny emerged gregariously.  Males from a gregarious line, when mated with females from a
  solitary line, caused the females to start having offspring more
  gregariously.  The opposite effect
  takes place when males from the solitary line are used.  Legner's hypothesis was that the males
  transferred some behavior modifying substance with their sperm to the female,
  which resulted in a higher or lower level of gregarious oviposition.  Here an alternative hypothesis is tested
  in which the level of gregarious emergence from hosts is determined by not
  only the number of eggs a female oviposits in a host, but also by the level
  of larval aggression.  The father's
  influence on the level of gregarious emergence in this hypothesis only takes
  place through his contribution to the genetic makeup of the larvae, with the
  larvae with a larger fraction of their genome from the solitary line showing
  higher levels of larval aggression. 
  ADD:  Under our experimental
  conditions the identity of the male did not influence the level of gregarious
  oviposition by a female, but it did have a significant influence on the
  number of larvae that survived.  The
  maternal behavior modification hypothesis did not apply significantly in this
  case where the cultures originated from new field acquisitions, the duration
  of the experiment was shorter and the parasitization environment was
  different than in the earlier investigations.  CONSIDER:  There may
  exist more than one reproductive strategy for this species involving
  cannibalism and oviposition restraint.   Keywords: oviposition behavior,
  larval aggression, clutch size ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Introduction  Species
  of the pteromalid genus Muscidifurax
  are parasitoids of synanthropic flies. 
  The genus is indigenous to the Americas where it shows great diversity
  (Kogan & Legner 1970).   Typically
  most species superparasitize with 2-3 eggs but only one wasp emerges per
  host.  However, in a South American
  species Muscidifurax raptorellus Kogan & Legner,
  two populations are known that differ in the number of wasps emerging per
  housefly pupa (Legner 1987a,b).  The
  form originating from Chile produces offspring gregariously, i.e. from
  approximately 60% of the hosts more than one wasp emerges while up to 17
  wasps have been known to emerge from a single housefly pupa (Legner
  1987b).  However, the form originating
  from Peru rarely produces more than one offspring per host.  The genetics of level of gregarious
  oviposition has been studied in detail by Legner (1987, 1988a,b; 1989a,b,c;
  1991a,b; 1993).  The level of
  gregarious emergence of the offspring of a virgin female was found to be
  determined by the proportion of the genome originating from the gregarious
  form (Legner 1987b).  The higher this
  proportion the higher the level of gregariousness.  This trait appears to be polygenically determined and 2‑19
  genes are involved in coding for this character (Legner 1991a).  More surprisingly, the level of
  gregariousness in offspring emergence was not only a function of the mother’s
  genetic makeup but the father's genetic background also influenced the level
  of gregariousness in which his offspring emerged.  Considerable amounts of data indicated that the male actually
  influences the females oviposition behavior in such a way that if the male
  originates from a gregarious line his mate lays her eggs more gregariously,
  and female lays fewer eggs per host when she mates with males originating
  from the solitary line (Legner 1987b, 1988b, 1993).  High levels of variation in these experiments suggested that
  other mechanisms might interplay in the paternal influencing of maternal
  behavior.  A number of possible
  behavior modifying substances, that could be transferred from the male to the
  female through the seminal fluid, have been suggested (Legner 1987b), these include
  hormones and bacteria.  Because males
  of the solitary line reduce the gregariousness of the offspring, and males of
  the gregarious line increase it one would have to assume the presence of two
  different substances: one that increases the level of gregarious oviposition
  and another that decreases this level.   Another
  hypothesis to explain level of gregarious emergence suggests that it is
  determined by two factors: a) the number of eggs a female lays per host and
  b) the level of aggressive interactions between the larvae emerging from the
  eggs.  The influence of the father in
  this hypothesis is primarily through his genetic contribution to his
  offspring (factor b), while under Legner's (1987b) original hypothesis the
  number of eggs a female lays is influenced by factor a.  These hypotheses were discriminated by
  mating females to males either of the gregarious form or of the solitary form
  and by determining  in half of the
  hosts the number of eggs that were oviposited and in the other half the
  number of wasps that emerged.  The
  mothers in these tests were  F1 hybrid
  females between the gregarious and solitary line.  These females were chosen because they are known to show both
  kinds of responses; i.e. when mated to a male of the gregarious line the
  females produce more offspring per host than when allowed to oviposit as
  virgins (Legner 1987b), and when such hybrid females are mated to solitary
  males they produce fewer offspring per host than virgin females.   Materials
  and Methods  Culture origin:  New field collections of Muscidifurax
  raptorellus from Peru and Chile were obtained in 1995.  FROM WHAT SPECIFIC AREA AND TIME OF YEAR
  IN EACH COUNTRY WERE THE CULTURES OBTAINED? A Peruvian/Chilean hybrid and a
  Chilean strain used in these experiments were maintained on pupae of the
  housefly (Musca domestica L.).  The hybrid was formed by mating large
  numbers of virgin Chilean females to Peruvian males followed by propagation
  of the culture for 6 generations, after which the hybrid continued to
  reproduce solitarily in mass culture. 
  ADD REFERENCE TO Kogan & Legner (1970).   Experimental
  setup: All experiments were done at 25EC and 24 hrs light.  Hybrid females between the solitary and
  gregarious lines were secured by mating solitary females with gregarious
  males.  Daughters of this cross were
  used in the experiment, where they were randomly assigned to one of three
  treatment groups.  The treatment
  groups consisted of mating the females to males of either (a) gregarious or
  (b) solitary strain or (c) leaving them unmated.  To each group respectively 16, 13 and 21 females were
  assigned.  After 24hrs the males were
  removed and each female was given 20 hosts daily for oviposition  The hosts of each day were randomly
  assigned to two groups of each 10 hosts. 
  The hosts of the first group were opened within 48 hrs after
  parasitization had taken place to determine the number of eggs laid per
  host.  The hosts of the second group
  were individually placed in a gelatin capsule (size 000) for wasp emergence.  In total the parasitization of these wasps
  was followed for 5 days, thus per mother 50 hosts were opened to determine
  the number of eggs laid per host and 50 hosts were kept for emergence.  WHAT ARE THE DIMENSIONS (or volume) OF THE
  HOUSEFLY PUPARIA?  -- WHAT IS THE
  PARASITIZATION ENVIRONMENT? (e.g., In screened polystyrene vials (46 cm3), with a basal are
  of 7 cm2, as in earlier experiments)   The
  experiment was done in such a way that the mother's group identity, i.e.
  whether she was mated to a solitary male or a gregarious male, was not known
  to the person who did the egg and wasp counts.  This avoided prior knowledge from influencing the results.   Analysis
  of variance was performed on the data derived from the two samples of fifty
  hosts that were either opened for egg counts or were left for wasp emergence
  for each mother: the percentage of the hosts that had been opened containing
  more than one egg, the percentage of hosts from which more than one wasp
  emerged, the difference between these two percentages, the total number of
  eggs in the egg sample, the total number of wasps in the wasp sample and the
  difference between the total number of eggs and the total number of wasps,
  the total number of parasitized hosts, i.e. those containing one or more eggs,
  the total number of parasitized hosts resulting in adult offspring and the
  difference between these two measurements per female.  No transformation was done for the
  statistical analysis of the data.  To
  determine the significance of the differences between means a Duncan's
  Multiple range test was used with alpha =0.05.   CONSIDERATION
  OF THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE ADDED:            
  Superparasitism (= insertion of more than one parasitoid egg per host)
  occurs in both the Peruvian and Chilean strain, and subsequent cannibalism by
  hatched larvae always follows.  The
  Peruvian strain deposits a lower number of eggs per host than the Chilean
  strain but a comparison of the cannibalism intensity of  both species is lacking.  Therefore, the average  number of eggs initially deposited by
  either species is unknown.  In the
  present experiments the number of progeny that survive is always less in the
  Peruvian strain and usually averages about one.  On the contrary, more adult survivors usually occur in the
  Chilean strain, averaging about seven at a host density of 20 per 24
  hrs.  A standardization of host
  density, size, age and duration of exposure to parasitization is essential in
  experiments as they influence the number of eggs deposited and the rate of
  cannibalism.      Results  The
  results shown in table 1 indicate that the percentage of hosts in which more than one egg
  was found did not differ significantly between females mated with a male from
  the gregarious line or the solitary line. 
  There was a significant difference however between females mated to
  solitary males versus virgin females in the proportion of the eggs that were
  placed gregariously on a host.  The
  percentage of wasps that emerged gregariously did however differ
  significantly between all groups with that percentage being the highest for
  the offspring of the gregarious male, intermediate for the offspring of the
  virgin females and the lowest for the offspring of the solitary males. The
  difference between the percentages of hosts with gregarious eggs vs
  gregarious wasps also differed between the three groups.  The group mated to the gregarious males
  showed the smallest difference, the virgin females were intermediate while
  the offspring of the solitary males showed the largest reduction in the
  percentage gregariousness.   There
  were no significant differences between the groups in the total number of
  eggs per 5 day sample (table 2), however the number of wasps that emerged from the five day
  sample did differ significantly: the gregarious group had a significantly
  higher number of adult progeny than the solitary or virgin group. These two
  groups however did not differ from each other in this characteristic.  The difference between the number of eggs
  per five-day sample and the number of wasps per sample differed among all
  groups with the gregarious group showing the smallest reduction in numbers
  and the solitary the highest.   Finally
  there appeared to be no difference in the number of hosts that contained eggs
  between the groups nor in the number of hosts giving rise to wasps or in the
  difference between the numbers of hosts containing eggs versus those giving
  rise to wasps (table 3).   Discussion  Indeed survival mechanisms in
  parasitoids include many behaviors; among which increased cannibalism by more
  aggressive larvae may be triggered during times of host scarcity.  In the current experiments the number of eggs laid per host by
  a hybrid the type of male to which she was mated did not appreciably
  influence female.  However, the
  genetic background of the male did influence the percentage of hosts from
  which more than one wasp emerged. 
  Consequently, the hypothesis that the male influences the female’s egg
  laying behavior has to be rather in favor of the hypothesis that larvae with
  a large proportion of their genome stemming from the solitary line somehow
  reduce the number that will eventually emerge from a host.  The number of eggs laid per mother did not
  differ between the groups, and neither did the number of hosts that has been
  parasitized.  Therefore, the reduction
  in the number of hosts from which wasps emerge gregariously was caused by a
  reduction during the larval stage. 
  Clearly, the offspring of the solitary males had the highest mortally,
  followed by that of the virgin females and the least mortality took place in
  the offspring of the gregarious males. 
  Several authors have reported that aggressive interactions take place
  between the larvae of the species M.
  raptor Girault &
  Sanders.  Wylie (1971) found that
  larvae of M. raptor will spend approximately
  the first ten hours after hatching moving about on the host while
  occasionally feeding on the pupa.  If
  a host has several eggs on it, the larva that hatches first attacks and kills
  most or all of the eggs.  If two
  larvae happen to survive the first instar, combat will take place in the
  second instar.  Podoler and Mendel
  (1977) report similar observations for M. raptor.  Legner (1987b) also reports that <2% of
  the hosts parasitized by the solitary form of M. raptorellus
  receive more than one egg, but rarely more than one wasp emerges.  This could also indicate that larval
  aggression occurs in this species and indeed aggression was observed between
  the larvae of the solitary form of this species.  Apparently the larval combat generally leads to only one wasp
  emerging per host, (table 3).   The level
  of aggressiveness between the larvae can be influenced to a maximal extent
  when males of the different lines are crossed with hybrid females between
  these lines.  The fertilized eggs
  result in female larvae that have on average either 75% of their genome from
  the solitary line ((S & X G %)& X S %)& or 25% of the solitary
  line ((S& X G%)& X G%)&. 
  In the first case the larvae apparently engage in combat which results
  in a reduction in the percentage of hosts that give rise to more than one
  offspring (fig. 1c).  While in the
  second case the larvae show less aggressive interactions, and per host, more
  of the eggs survive to give rise to adult wasps (fig. 1a).  The offspring of the virgin females is
  intermediate because all of their offspring will have on average 50% of their
  genome stemming from the solitary line (fig 1c.).  There could also be an influence of the father on the survival
  of male and female larvae in these crosses. 
  In the case of solitary fathers the fertilized eggs, i.e. daughters
  have on average 75% of the genome of the solitary line and can be expected to
  fight more than their male siblings, which have 50% of their genome from the
  solitary line.  In the case of
  offspring of the gregarious males, their daughters have only 25% of their
  genome coming from the solitary line while the males have 50% of their genome
  coming from the solitary line. 
  Consequently, in those cases where one male and one female are placed
  in a host in case of the "gregarious" group it would be expected that
  the one male one female combination would be more prevalent than in case of
  the "solitary" group, while at the same time the one male group
  should be larger in the gregarious line than in the solitary line. Although
  indeed these trends are visible in the data (table 4) they are rather subtle,
  probably mainly because the fraction of the hosts receiving one male and
  female egg is limited in these crosses.   The gregarious
  emergence is the result of two, possibly linked, effects: the number of eggs
  a female oviposits per host, this effect is determined purely by the female’s
  genome and secondly the level of aggressive interactions between the larvae,
  this level is influenced by the genetic background of both parents.  Females of the solitary line lay fewer
  eggs per host than the females of the gregarious line.  It is suspected that larvae of the
  gregarious line show little aggressive behavior towards each other, while the
  larvae of the solitary line are aggressive. The gregarious strain also
  superasitizes:  that is, more eggs are
  laid in a host than will survive to adulthood.  The cause of the mortality in the ones that do not survive
  could be due to genetic inferiority or to some degree of aggressiveness.
  These two groups of genes could interact in such a way that they would
  enhance each other.  The higher the
  percentage of the genome stemming from the gregarious line the higher the
  number of hosts with more than one egg and the lower the level of larval
  aggression, in contrast the lower the percentage of the gregarious genome the
  lower the level of gregarious oviposition and the higher the level of larval
  aggression.  Therefore, one would
  expect a slight s shaped curve to describe the relationship between
  the percentage of the genome from the gregarious line in a virgin mother and
  the percentage of the hosts giving rise to more than one offspring.  When this relationship (Legner 1987b,
  1991a) is inspected indeed such a deviation, albeit slight, is found.  The findings of Legner (1987b, 1991a) on
  the number of genes influencing the gregarious and solitary oviposition
  should be reexamined in the light of these two groups genes being
  involved.  The finding that within one
  species both solitary, fighting forms and gregarious, non‑fighting
  forms appears to be unique to M.
  raptorellus.  This will allow the testing of some of the
  theory developed by Godfray (1987) on the evolution of solitary and
  gregarious oviposition.   There is
  also a heterosis in the F-1 hybrids that is not explained in this
  discussion.  The heterosis is
  expressed in several ways:  higher
  numbers of offspring and hosts killed, etc. 
  Also, backcrossing data suggest that at least eight loci were actively
  segregating for gregariousness behavior.   DIFFERENCES FROM PREVIOUS
  STUDIES IN THE EXPERIMENTAL ENVIRONMENT, HOST SIZE, QUALITY AND DENSITY
  SHOULD BE NOTED HERE TO EXPLAIN LARVAL CANIBALISM RATES.   ALSO 
  :  There may exist more than
  one reproductive strategy for this species involving cannibalism and
  oviposition restraint.     Acknowledgement  Support
  for P. Strippentow from a European Union Tempus grant is gratefully
  acknowledged.  Conversations with
  Molly Hunter and Marcel Visser greatly helped to clarify our thinking about
  this phenomenon.  Leo Koopman, André
  Gidding and Frans van Aggelen kindly supplied host for these experiments.   References  Godfray, H. C. J.  1987.  The evolution of
  clutch size in parasitic wasps.  Am.
  Nat. 129: 221‑233    ADD:   Kogan, M. & E. F. Legner.  1970.  A biosystematic revision of the genus Muscidifurax (Hymenoptera:
  Pteromalidae) with descriptions of  four
  new species.  Canad. Entomol. 102(10):  1268-1290.   Legner, E.
  F.  1987a.  Further
  insights into extranuclear influences on behavior elicited by males in the
  genus Muscidifurax.  Proc. 52 annual conf.  Cal. Mosquito and Vector Control
  Association: 127‑130.    Legner, E.
  F.  1987b. 
  Inheritance of gregarious and solitary development in Muscidifurax raptorellus.  Can. Ent. 119: 791‑808.    Legner, E. F.  1988a. 
  Hybridization in principal parasitoids of synanthropic diptera: The
  genus Muscidifurax. Hilgardia 56(4): 36pp.    Legner, E.
  F.  1988b.  Muscidifurax raptorellus females exhibit
  postmating oviposition behavior typical of the male genome.  Ann. Entomol.
  Soc.  Am. 81: 522‑527
     Legner, E.
  F.  1989a. 
  Wary genes and accretive inheritance in Hymenoptera.  Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 82: 245‑249.
     Legner, E. F. 
  1989b.  Paternal influences in
  males of Muscidifurax raptorellus.  Entomophaga 34: 307‑320    Legner, E.
  F.  1989c. 
  Phenotypic expression of polygenes in Muscidifurax raptorellus,
  a synanthropic fly parasitoid. Entomophaga
  34: 523‑530.    Legner.  E. F. 
  1991a.  Estimations of
  number of active loci, dominance and heritability in polygenic inheritance of
  gregarious behavior in  Muscidifurax raptorellus.  Entomophaga
  36: 1‑18    Legner, E.
  F.  1991b. 
  Recombinant males in the parasitic wasp Muscidifurax raptorellus.
  Entomophaga 36: 173‑181   Legner, E.
  F.  1993. 
  Theory for quantitative inheritance of behavior in a protelean
  parasitoid, Muscidifurax raptorellus (Hymenoptera:        Pteromalidae).  Eur. J. Entomol. 90: 
  11-21.   Podoler, H.
  & Z. Mendel.  1977.  Analysis of solitariness in a
  parasite-host system (Muscidifurax raptor – Ceratitis capitata).  Ecol. Entomol
  2:   153-160   Wylie, H.
  G.  1971. 
  Observations on intraspecific larval competition in three
  hymenopterous parasites of fly puparia. Can. Ent. 103: 137‑142   ADDITIONAL REFERENCES FOR
  CONSIDERATION:   Ables, J. R. & M. Shepard. 1976b. Influence of temperature on
  oviposition by the parasites Spalangia
  endius and Muscidifurax raptor. Environ. Ent. 5:
  511-13.   Ables, J. R., M. Shepard & J. R. Holman. 1976. Development of
  the parasitoids Spalangia endius and Muscidifurax raptor
  in relation to constant and variable temperatures: simulation and validation.
  Environ. Ent. 5: 329-32.   Broadbent, A. B. 1972. A study of the sex ratios of Muscidifurax zaraptor and Muscidifurax uniraptor (Hymenoptera:
  Pteromalidae) as affected by changes in some environmental conditions. B. Sc.
  Hon. Project, Victoria Univ. of Wellington, New Zealand   Capehart, J. S., R. L. Harris & D. E. Bay. 1981. The effect
  of host species on developmental time of Muscidifurax
  raptor and Spalangia drosophilae. Southwestern Ent. 6: 136-29.   Coats, S. A. 1976. Life cycle and behavior of Muscidifurax zaraptor (Hymenoptera:
  Pteromalidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 60: 772-80.   Fabritius, K. 1981c. The influence of relative humidity on the
  biological potential of Muscidifurax
  raptor Gir. & Sand.
  (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae). Stud. Cerc. Biol., Seria biol. anim. T-34(1):
  62-9. [in Romanian w/ English summary].   Geden, C. J., L. Smith, S. J. Long & D. A. Rutz. 1992a. Rapid
  deterioration of searching behavior, host destruction, and fecundity of the
  parasitoid Muscidifurax raptor (Hymenoptera:
  Pteromalidae) in culture. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 85: 179-87.   Klunker,
  R. 1981. Untersuchungen zur Biologie und Zucht des Puparien-Parasitoiden Muscidifurax raptor Girault & Sanders
  (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der
  Wirtseignung von kältekonservierten Puparien der Stubenfliege (Musca domestica L.) für eine Massenzucht. Abschlussarb.
  postgrad. Stud., Humboldt Univ., Bln., Berlin. 57 p.   McCoy, C. W. 1967. Biosystematic and field studies of two
  parasites of the Muscidifurax
  raptor complex (Hymenoptera:
  Pteromalidae) with particular reference to sex determination. Ph.D. Thesis,
  Univ. of California, Riverside. 179 p.   Wylie, H. G. 1967. Some effects of host size on
  Nasonia vitripennis and Muscidifurax
  raptor (Hymenoptera:
  Pteromalidae). Canad. Ent. 99: 742-48.   Wylie, H. G. 1971. Oviposition restraint of Muscidifurax zaraptor
  K. & L. (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) on parasitized housefly pupae. Canad.
  Ent. 103: 1537-44.   Wylie, H. G. 1979. Sex ratio variability of Muscidifurax zaraptor
  (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Canad. Ent. 111: 105-9.   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   Table 1.  Mean and standard error of the percentage of hosts that
  contained more than one egg (egg/hst), from which more than one wasp emerged
  (wasp/hst), and the difference between these values for hybrid females that
  had mated either with a gregarious male, had remained virgin or had mated
  with a solitary male.                     n               >egg/hst                                                     >wasps/hst                               difference   gregarious male                                    16            38.4
  (2.39)                                28.7
  (2.13)                                
  9.8  (2.93)   virgin                                     21             33.8 (2.08)                                12.3 (1.86)                                21.6  (2.56)                     solitary male                          13             43.1 (2.65)                                 5.3 (2.36)                                                37.8  (3.25)       Table 2. Mean and standard error of the total number of offspring
  (eggs or wasps) and the difference between these numbers, for hybrid females
  that had mated either with a gregarious male, had remained virgin or had
  mated with a solitary male.                        n               >egg/hst                                                     >wasps/hst                               difference   gregarious male                                    16            60.6
  (2.25)                               54.8 (1.97)                               5.8
  (1.95)   virgin                                  22            57.0 (1.97)                                43.2
  (1.72)                                13.8
  (1.71)                     solitary male                          13             58.8 (2.51)                                38.7 (2.19)                                20.1 (2.17)       Table 3.  Mean and standard error of the number of
  parasitized hosts indicated by the presence                 of
  one or more eggs, by the emergence of one or more wasps and the difference
  between these numbers, for hybrid females that had mated either with a
  gregarious male, had remained virgin or had mated with a solitary male.   n               hosts with egg                        host
  with wasps                     difference   gregarious male                    16             41.6 (1.24)                                40.3
  (1.40)                                
  1.3 (0.93)   virgin                                         21             40.9 (1.08)                                38.9 (1.22)                                 2.1 (0.81)   solitary male                          13             39.2 (1.37)                                37.3 (1.55)                                 1.9 (1.03)       Table 4. Total egg and wasps
  distribution per host for females that had either mated with males from a
  gregarious line, had remained virgin or had mated with males from a solitary
  line.  Egg allocation per host,
  represented as the percentage of all hosts in egg sample containing either 1,
  2, 3 or 4 eggs.  Wasp distribution per
  hosts represented as the percentage of hosts containing a male (M) or a
  female (F) or a combination of the two.     No.                             Sample dissected for egg counts       of mothers                  ---------------------------------------------------------           % of hosts with 1-4 eggs                              No.                             1               2               3               4 hosts                    gregarious male                    16             677                            62.5         32.2         5.0            0.3                                  
  virgin                                                22            855                      65.1              30.4          
  3.7             0.7   solitary male                          13             507                      56.8            36.9         5.3            1.0       No.                             Sample left for wasp counts of                               ----------------------------------------------------------------- mothers                                   % of
  hosts from which males and/or females emerged   No.           1M           1F             2M           2F             1M1F      1M2F      3M           3F hosts   gregarious male                    16             661           10.8         59.6         
  0              23.1          3.5          
  0.3           0               2.6                                
  virgin                                22             803           
  87.5     0           12.1          0                0               0        
  0.4                 0   solitary male                          13             483            9.3           86.1         0              3.5             1.0            0              0                0       |